0

WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF

We all too often think of things in one dimension terms, but what happens when computers can run in computers, and AI’s can run in AI’s, or both can run in each other? And evolve themselves … ?

 

Love the Exponential Future? Join our XPotential Community, future proof yourself with courses from XPotential University, read about exponential tech and trendsconnect, watch a keynote, or browse my blog.

I recently wrote about a researcher who built a virtual computer in a virtual world which in itself would create a weird infinitely looping paradox and which could be possible of continuous self improvement. And now in a similar move it turns an Artificial Intelligence (AI) has built a computer inside itself that can run code, such as another AI or … whatever. Including games obviously. And, since this technology or trend doesn’t have a name yet I’ve decided to call it Meta Artificial Intelligence (MAI), to go along with the Meta Computing trend, which also didn’t have a name. And if you can think of a better name then I’m all ears … perhaps Multi-Dimensional AI? Huh?

 

RELATED
Jack Dorsey wants Elon Musk to turn Twitter into a protocol not a company

 

In this case the AI mimics the operation of a standard computer within its neural network and it could be used to speed up certain calculations. Researchers have used it to put an AI inside an AI and play Pong.

If you want a computer to do something, you have to write code that manipulates bits of data. But if you code an AI-driven neural network, you have to train it with feedback before it can do anything. For instance, a neural network can distinguish between photos of cats and dogs after being shown thousands of examples and told if its guesses are correct.

Now Jason Kim and Dani Bassett at the University of Pennsylvania have a new approach, in which a neural network runs a code, just like an ordinary computer.

 

RELATED
Manga legend scolds AI created zombie animation as an insult to life

 

A neural network is a series of nodes, or artificial neurons, that takes an input and returns a changed output. The pair calculated what effect individual artificial neurons had, and used this to piece together a very simple neural network that could carry out basic tasks, such as addition.

Kim and Bassett then linked several networks together in chains so they could do more complex operations, replicating the behaviour of the logic gates found in computer chips. These chains were combined to make a network that could do things a classical computer can, including running a virtual neural network and a playable version of the game Pong.

The virtual neural network can also drastically simplify splitting up huge computational tasks. These are often spread over many processors to gain speed, but take more power to be split into chunks that can be run independently by separate chips, then recombined.

 

RELATED
AI and automation: The benefits for business and industry

 

An emerging breed of machine called a neuromorphic computer, a computer so powerful it could fit he computing power found in today’s biggest supercomputers into a package no larger than your fingernail, designed to efficiently run AI software, may also be able to help these virtual networks work faster.

While a computer uses its CPU to carry out tasks, and stores data in memory, a neuromorphic computer uses artificial neurons to both store and compute, lowering the number of operations it must carry out. Neuromorphic computers may also make it easier for software to accurately work with continuous variables, such as those in physics simulations.

Francesco Martinuzzi at Leipzig University in Germany says neural networks running code could squeeze better performance out of neuromorphic chips.

 

RELATED
AI can sense students levels of stress from phone data and forms

 

“There will definitely be specific applications where these computers are going to be outperforming standard computers. And by far, I believe.”

Abdelrahman Zayed at Montreal Polytechnic in Canada says this could be exciting, so long as the chains can avoid long calculations failing if an algorithm forgets the beginning as it is learning the end.

These neural networks would also need to be scaled up.

“Computers don’t just have one or two logic gates – a CPU will have billions of transistors,” says Zayed. “Just because it worked for two or three gates, that doesn’t necessarily mean that it will scale up to billions.”

Watch this space.

Reference: arxiv.org/abs/2203.05032

About author

Matthew Griffin

Matthew Griffin, described as “The Adviser behind the Advisers” and a “Young Kurzweil,” is the founder and CEO of the World Futures Forum and the 311 Institute, a global Futures and Deep Futures consultancy working between the dates of 2020 to 2070, and is an award winning futurist, and author of “Codex of the Future” series. Regularly featured in the global media, including AP, BBC, Bloomberg, CNBC, Discovery, RT, Viacom, and WIRED, Matthew’s ability to identify, track, and explain the impacts of hundreds of revolutionary emerging technologies on global culture, industry and society, is unparalleled. Recognised for the past six years as one of the world’s foremost futurists, innovation and strategy experts Matthew is an international speaker who helps governments, investors, multi-nationals and regulators around the world envision, build and lead an inclusive, sustainable future. A rare talent Matthew’s recent work includes mentoring Lunar XPrize teams, re-envisioning global education and training with the G20, and helping the world’s largest organisations envision and ideate the future of their products and services, industries, and countries. Matthew's clients include three Prime Ministers and several governments, including the G7, Accenture, Aon, Bain & Co, BCG, Credit Suisse, Dell EMC, Dentons, Deloitte, E&Y, GEMS, Huawei, JPMorgan Chase, KPMG, Lego, McKinsey, PWC, Qualcomm, SAP, Samsung, Sopra Steria, T-Mobile, and many more.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *