Matthew Griffin, described as “The Adviser behind the Advisers” and a “Young Kurzweil,” is the founder and CEO of the World Futures Forum and the 311 Institute, a global Futures and Deep Futures consultancy working between the dates of 2020 to 2070, and is an award winning futurist, and author of “Codex of the Future” series. Regularly featured in the global media, including AP, BBC, Bloomberg, CNBC, Discovery, RT, Viacom, and WIRED, Matthew’s ability to identify, track, and explain the impacts of hundreds of revolutionary emerging technologies on global culture, industry and society, is unparalleled. Recognised for the past six years as one of the world’s foremost futurists, innovation and strategy experts Matthew is an international speaker who helps governments, investors, multi-nationals and regulators around the world envision, build and lead an inclusive, sustainable future. A rare talent Matthew’s recent work includes mentoring Lunar XPrize teams, re-envisioning global education and training with the G20, and helping the world’s largest organisations envision and ideate the future of their products and services, industries, and countries. Matthew's clients include three Prime Ministers and several governments, including the G7, Accenture, Aon, Bain & Co, BCG, Credit Suisse, Dell EMC, Dentons, Deloitte, E&Y, GEMS, Huawei, JPMorgan Chase, KPMG, Lego, McKinsey, PWC, Qualcomm, SAP, Samsung, Sopra Steria, T-Mobile, and many more.
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF
The future of air combat will increasingly fought by autonomous systems, not human pilots, and the race to create those systems has already begun.
I’ve been talking about the rise of fully autonomous warfare for a while ago, and while Admirals and Generals everywhere still say that there will “always be a human in the loop” we’ve seen demonstrations of the world’s first fully autonomous kill chains, and the deployment of fully autonomous Reaper squadrons out of Jacksonville, Florida, and the successful trials of the first fully autonomous warship with more, like the $4Billion US Navy Zumwalt class of destroyers, on the way.
A while ago I also wrote about how the US Marines wanted to develop a fully autonomous F-35, and how an Artificial Intelligence (AI) called ALPHA AI running on a Raspberry Pi managed to absolutely thrash some of the US Air Force’s most experienced fighter pilots in simulated air battles.
Now the USAF is ready to take the idea to the next stage and pit these AI pilots and their autonomous drones against human fighter jet pilots for real. This week the USAF announced that their research teams “are now designing an autonomous aircraft that can take down a manned plane in air-to-air combat, with the goal of pitting the two against each other in July 2021.”
Lt. Gen. Jack Shanahan, head of the Pentagon’s Joint Artificial Intelligence Center, said the Air Force Research Laboratory team is pushing the boundaries of what the military can build, compared to the aircraft that already fill the service’s squadrons.
“[Team leader Steve Rogers] is probably going to have a hard time getting to that flight next year … when the machine beats the human,” Shanahan said during a June 4 Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies event. “If he does it, great.”
The AFRL team launched its pursuit of an unmanned, AI-driven fighter jet in 2018, aiming to show promise within 18 months. Inside Defense reported in May 2018 the “big moonshot” would first insert machine learning technology into a less-advanced plane, like an F-16, before trying it in a newer jet, like an F-35 or F-22.
“Our human pilots, the really good ones, have a couple thousand hours of experience,” said Rogers. “What happens if I can augment their ability with a system that can have literally millions of hours of training time? … How can I make myself a tactical autopilot so in an air-to-air fight, this system could help make decisions on a timeline that humans can’t even begin to think about?”
If the project works, the invention would join the slew of other AI enabled systems the Air Force wants to add to its inventory. The Skyborg wingman drone concept is perhaps the highest profile of those programs, though the USAF is pushing to add AI and machine learning algorithms to everything from maintenance practices to battle planning software.
AFRL’s project echoes the debate revived earlier this year about whether an autonomous fighter could successfully challenge one with a human in the cockpit, sparked by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk’s comments at an Air Force Association conference in February.
“The [F-35] competitor should be a drone fighter plane that’s remote controlled by a human, but with its manoeuvres augmented by autonomy,” Musk tweeted. “The F-35 would have no chance against it.”
But while the Pentagon’s AI work is picking up steam, Shanahan cautioned that not everything happening with the futuristic technology is a success story. The military should adopt the lessons the self-driving car industry has learned, he said and heed its warnings.
“There is no level four, fully autonomous vehicle out on the roads today,” he said, despite several companies investing billions of dollars in the idea. “On the other hand, that’s a decade worth of experience we should be pulling into the military because they’ve learned so much.”