Matthew Griffin, award winning Futurist and Founder of the 311 Institute is described as "The Adviser behind the Advisers." Recognised for the past five years as one of the world's foremost futurists, innovation and strategy experts Matthew is an author, entrepreneur international speaker who helps investors, multi-nationals, regulators and sovereign governments around the world envision, build and lead the future. Today, asides from being a member of Centrica's prestigious Technology and Innovation Committee and mentoring XPrize teams, Matthew's accomplishments, among others, include playing the lead role in helping the world's largest smartphone manufacturers ideate the next five generations of mobile devices, and what comes beyond, and helping the world's largest high tech semiconductor manufacturers envision the next twenty years of intelligent machines. Matthew's clients include Accenture, Bain & Co, Bank of America, Blackrock, Bloomberg, Booz Allen Hamilton, Boston Consulting Group, Dell EMC, Dentons, Deloitte, Deutsche Bank, Du Pont, E&Y, Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, HPE, Huawei, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, Lloyds Banking Group, McKinsey & Co, Monsanto, PWC, Qualcomm, Rolls Royce, SAP, Samsung, Schroeder's, Sequoia Capital, Sopra Steria, UBS, the UK's HM Treasury, the USAF and many others.
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF
- Governments want backdoors in software and criminals want to exploit them to spread malware, now a blockchain based system from Switzerland could put a stop to both
A new blockchain based software update framework from the team at the Decentralized-Distributed Systems (DEDIS) lab at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland could help prevent the spread of malware like Petya, but, as an added bonus it would also make it difficult, if not impossible, for governments to force software companies to deliver software updates with backdoors in them in secret.
The Petya ransomware, and its “wiperware” variant NotPetya, were both spread after an attacker managed to take over the network of Ukrainian accounting firm, M.E. Doc, and inject malicious code into one of their legitimate software updates.
The new proof-of-concept technology, which has been dubbed “Chainiac” by its team is a first of a kind decentralised framework that eliminates these single points of failure and enforces a new level of transparency on software updates which, in turn, makes it possible for security analysts and other interested individuals to continuously review and monitor the authenticity of updates and identify vulnerabilities.
“What Chainiac is trying to do,” said Bryan Ford who led the group that conducted the research, “is create an end-to-end architecture for software life cycle management, all the way from the developers to deployment and updates on end-user devices.”
As criminals and nation states continue to increase their attacks on the software supply chain it’s going to become increasingly important that we can ensure the integrity of the software we all use, and rely on. After all, I doubt you’ll want to download a version of Apple’s next iOS update only to then find the NSA, or someone else is watching you via your webcam.
Wave and say hi, now go and get the sticky tape and shove it over the lens – who says beating the government isn’t easy? For example, documents released by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that in 2011, the NSA was looking at how to compromise the Google Play Store in order to replace legitimate smartphone apps with backdoor versions they could use to spy on users or even manipulate them with targeted propaganda. And over in the UK, under the Investigatory Powers Act, which came into force in January this year, the government’s currently considering passing a law that will legally compel software makers to build backdoors into their software using secret court orders – and other nations are following suit.
“How do we know what software we are really running?” said Emin Gün Sirer, associate professor at Cornell University and co-director of the Initiative for Cryptocurrencies and Smart Contracts, “a lot of attacks go after that exact foundation. Someone switches the binaries you’re using but everything appears to be the same.”
Chainiac builds on Cothority, a blockchain based transparency tool Ford’s team released in 2015 that allows independent individuals and experts to collectively sign off on the authenticity of software updates.
Collective signing means that every time Apple, for example, releases a new iOS update the iOS device won’t accept the update until it’s been collectively signed and verified by a threshold number of thousands of trusted witnesses attesting publicly that a valid, non-backdoored update had been issued.
However, while a collectively signed software updates could still contain backdoored code, for example, developers could be bribed, blackmailed, or threatened to insert a backdoor, Cothority, now a component of Chainiac, would make it impossible to ship the update in secret. Chainiac also integrates reproducible builds, a system which lets technical end users, or automated witness servers, to recompile the source code and get a byte-for-byte identical binary, ensuring the distributed binaries haven’t been tampered with.
“The essence of the idea is that [Chainiac] allows users, who just want the latest binary, to check this one collective signature,” Ford said, “and see that this signature shows that this group of Cothority servers has independently reproduced this binary, and tested that this is the one and only correct output corresponding to the source code that the developer has produced.”
The Debian Project has already deployed reproducible builds for 94 percent of the tens of thousands of software packages that make up that Linux distribution, which is widely used on cloud servers and embedded devices, plus its downstream variant Ubuntu. Ford’s team tested Chainiac on Debian packages with good results, and Debian seems like they could be an early adopter.
Meanwhile, proprietary software, such as Apple’s iOS or Microsoft’s Windows, could also use Chainiac to achieve similar levels of transparency, Ford emphasized.
“In that case the Cothority nodes responsible for checking the reproducible builds need to be run by organisations that have NDAs with the software provider giving them access to the source code for this purpose. That makes it at least in principle feasible for proprietary software,” he added.
The project also incorporates a novel form of blockchain technology, called a “Skipchain,” that allows software updates to be announced on a distributed ledger.
“Blockchains are used to transfer things, but that’s not their only use,” Sirer said, “they’re great for transferring things like Bitcoin, but they’re also great for announcing facts. … [Chainiac] is also a broadcast medium for vetting software updates.”
Ford’s research seems unlikely to please government leaders who are increasingly frustrated at the growing use of encryption, as well as the upcoming 5G standard, and how it cuts off their ability in some ways, but not completely, to surveil people.
If you’re a government type though put down those tissues, and stop wiping your eyes, because, thanks to Quantum Computers, you’ll soon be able to crack over 70 percent of all the encryption standards on the planet in mere minutes. Yes dear spyling, swap those tears of sadness for tears of joy and get back to your massive bank of screens, crack open a fresh beer and sit back and watch us all on your huge bank of TV monitors. Oh the joy. Anyway back to the story…
Chainiac is the latest salvo in an increasingly bitter war between software makers and governments for control of the integrity of the code on which our lives depend, and it’s also likely that nation states who want to subvert the software development process for law enforcement or espionage purposes are already looking for new ways to undermine these new “transparency mechanisms.”
“We’ve seen sovereign states put enormous resources into hacking,” Sirer said, “will [Chainiac] be open to gaming? Will it be more secure or open to attack? There is every reason for hope and every reason for experimentation.”
Cryptographers have been vocal against government use of backdoored software updates, arguing that destroying trust in software updates makes everyone less safe, and security expert Bruce Schneier, a fellow at the Berkman Klein Center at Harvard University, said it is never acceptable for governments to use backdoored software updates.
“It is akin to a public health issue,” he said, “we need everyone to be able to trust the update process implicitly, and that it will always work in the best interests of the user. Hijacking that process for surveillance or espionage purposes threatens to undermine trust in one of the most critical security technologies we need and all rely on.”