0

WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF

When we do eventually build a colony on the Moon the colonists will need power, this is one way to achieve that, but there are others …

 

Interested in the Exponential Future? Join our XPotential Community, future proof yourself with courses from our XPotential Academyconnect, watch a keynote, or browse my blog.

While scientists at NASA want to build solar power plants in space, and take the Chinese head on, elsewhere scientists at the US Department of Energy (DoE) who recently 3D printed a working mini nuclear reactor in their lab, complete with fissionable material, have now crafted a new design for a nuclear power plant they say could help humans to colonise the moon, possibly in a NASA inspired moonbase made out of fungi, and they want it ready to go by 2026 – three years after Jeff Bezos plans on starting building his own moonbase. That said though there are challenges with generating nuclear power on the moon.

Designing this special reactor is kind of like adapting terrestrial technology to be mounted on, say, a residential sailboat. The fundamentals can be the same, but there are limitations because of the different environment. A power plant for the moon must be almost totally self-sufficient and run without the influence of gravity or Earth’s atmosphere. It has to be light and small enough that everything can be lifted into space.

 

RELATED
Google reportedly mulls investing in a hypersonic tunnelling boring company

 

Design Development Today reports that the Union of Concerned Scientists, who are surprisingly a real thing, expressed, well, concerns:

“Edwin Lyman, director of Nuclear Power Safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists, a nonprofit, said his organization is concerned the parameters of the design and timeline make the most likely reactors those that use highly enriched uranium, which can be made into weapons. Nations have generally been attempting to reduce the amount of enriched uranium being produced for that reason.”

While the Idaho National Laboratory and the DoE broadly are pushing for “advanced” reactor technology in terms of issues like modularity and safety, the “parameters of the design and timeline” they refer to -in this case advocating for a small, reliable, space-friendly design in just 6 years – almost definitely rules out the modular reactors being developed and certified now.

 

RELATED
UBeam uses sound to wirelessly charge phones on stage, confounds critics

 

To fully test and regulate these reactors, and design the special edition to send to the moon in this timeframe, is probably impossible. To rush any nuclear approval is a terrible idea, not just for safety, but also for a public that’s already shy about nuclear energy, and meanwhile technology like thorium fuel which is being lined up for use in future Thorium Reactors is still far from ready for the market so while it’s also a potential candidate it’s a distant one.

Low-enriched uranium, meanwhile, is a good alternative, and it already powers many nuclear plants on Earth. But a reactor that must weigh just a few tons is more like the ones that currently power nuclear submarines and icebreakers. They use much denser fuel sources because of the size constraints.

DoE officials say the only purpose of this plant is to help power everything associated with an effort to explore the moon’s south pole. And their formal request means they’ll receive ideas from all over the existing nuclear research infrastructure, so there’s no guarantee the best solution will require highly enriched uranium at all.

 

RELATED
World first as researchers 3D print capacitors straight into PCB's

 

Nuclear startup NuScale’s modular reactor uses low-enriched uranium, for example, but couldn’t meet the requirements for the moon without some modification and further development.

In a statement, Idaho National Laboratory says the reactor solution it hopes to find for the moon could also be adapted and applied for future Mars missions. That will present even more challenges, but Elon Musk has suggested a nuclear reactor as a propulsion system, like the ones put forward recently by Russia’s Roscosmos, to help people get to Mars. One day though maybe, just maybe, like the combination Pizza Hut and Taco Bell, we’ll end up with the best of both worlds …

About author

Matthew Griffin

Matthew Griffin, described as “The Adviser behind the Advisers” and a “Young Kurzweil,” is the founder and CEO of the World Futures Forum and the 311 Institute, a global Futures and Deep Futures consultancy working between the dates of 2020 to 2070, and is an award winning futurist, and author of “Codex of the Future” series. Regularly featured in the global media, including AP, BBC, Bloomberg, CNBC, Discovery, RT, Viacom, and WIRED, Matthew’s ability to identify, track, and explain the impacts of hundreds of revolutionary emerging technologies on global culture, industry and society, is unparalleled. Recognised for the past six years as one of the world’s foremost futurists, innovation and strategy experts Matthew is an international speaker who helps governments, investors, multi-nationals and regulators around the world envision, build and lead an inclusive, sustainable future. A rare talent Matthew’s recent work includes mentoring Lunar XPrize teams, re-envisioning global education and training with the G20, and helping the world’s largest organisations envision and ideate the future of their products and services, industries, and countries. Matthew's clients include three Prime Ministers and several governments, including the G7, Accenture, Aon, Bain & Co, BCG, Credit Suisse, Dell EMC, Dentons, Deloitte, E&Y, GEMS, Huawei, JPMorgan Chase, KPMG, Lego, McKinsey, PWC, Qualcomm, SAP, Samsung, Sopra Steria, T-Mobile, and many more.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *