Companies that embraced AI are now drowning in AI generated slop
Firms that measure AI by output volume risk eroding the knowledge and trust they need to make good decisions.
Key takeaways
- The Harvard Business Review warns that over-relying on AI can cause knowledge decay, the deterioration of organisational knowledge over time.
- Low-quality AI output wastes colleagues' time, erodes trust and forces staff to spend more time verifying facts.
- AI has also made hiring harder, with trust in the recruitment process at all-time lows for job seekers and recruiters.
- The HBR says public LLMs often add little value, while proprietary models or proprietary data may well add value.
Cite or link to this article
Griffin, M. (2026) 'Companies that embraced AI are now drowning in AI generated slop', Fanatical Futurist, 20 Jun 2026. Available at: https://www.fanaticalfuturist.com/2026/06/ai-workslop-knowledge-decay-companies/
Companies that went all in on using Generative AI tools are developing a major “workslop” problem. In their pursuit to boost productivity, become less reliant on human labour, and reassure investors that they’re riding the cutting edge of tech, some nagging issues are cropping up. As the Harvard Business Review points out, over-relying on Artificial Intelligence (AI) can prove disastrous for organisational knowledge, the critical business insights companies need to make strategic decisions.
The phenomenon, dubbed “knowledge decay,” describes the deterioration of information over time, marked by workers forgetting skills and organisations relying on outdated processes. In the context of AI, it can be a dangerous downward spiral that starts with workers using AI to produce low-quality work, which wastes colleagues’ time, erodes trust, and gradually sloppifies organisational knowledge into worthless soup.
Multiply that by entire departments, and a business’s outputs start to crumble as well, as the Harvard Business Review explains.
It’s an already familiar trend. Even in the early days of the AI boom, experts warned that employees may be spending more time hunting down the many errors being made by unreliable and hallucinating AI tools than if they weren’t using the tech at all. Some companies even resorted to hiring workers specifically to fix AI errors.
The Future of AI, Software, Work, and Leadership, a keynote by futurist Matthew Griffin
“Errors compound and pile up,” the Harvard Business Review writes. “Trust in information erodes. People spend more time verifying facts or risk costly and dangerous mistakes. Eventually, people start to lose trust in the processes that they rely on to do their jobs.”
None of this should be particularly surprising to workers, who have been forced to use AI against their will at work as they watch the labour market deteriorate in real time. Their bosses’ insistence on AI has triggered a mass rebellion, with disillusioned workers suffering from low morale and even sabotaging the tech at work.
Hiring new workers has also turned into a quagmire for companies in large part thanks to AI, making the recruiting of qualified candidates extremely difficult.
“The overall impact of AI ‘augmenting’ each step is that it has sunk trust in the process to all-time lows for both job seekers and recruiters,” the Harvard Business Review explains.
To stop the “slopification” of work and knowledge decay, business leaders are now forced to ensure that information is being meticulously verified and cleared of AI hallucinations or errors, a labour-intensive process that eats up the time of actual human employees.
Going forward, a shift is clearly needed: employers need to figure out how to ensure that AI is only being used when it actually makes sense and adds value.
“For many tasks, using public LLMs often adds little to no real value,” the Harvard Business Review wrote. “It creates generic prose that often contains mistakes. But the use of proprietary models and/or leveraging proprietary data may well add value.”
In short, now that much of the early hype about AI leading to a productivity revolution and making human labour a thing of the past has been stripped away, and companies that embraced AI are forced to pick up the pieces or risk deteriorating into irrelevancy - an AI hangover that could haunt them for years to come.
FAQ
What is AI workslop and knowledge decay?
Workslop is low-quality work produced with AI that wastes colleagues' time. The Harvard Business Review says it can drive knowledge decay, the deterioration of organisational knowledge over time, as errors pile up, trust erodes and people stop relying on the processes they need to do their jobs.
Why is AI generated slop a problem for companies?
Errors compound and pile up, trust in information erodes, and people spend more time verifying facts or risk costly mistakes. Multiplied across entire departments, the Harvard Business Review says a business's outputs can start to crumble.
How has AI affected hiring?
According to the Harvard Business Review, AI augmenting each step of hiring has sunk trust in the process to all-time lows for both job seekers and recruiters, making it extremely difficult to recruit qualified candidates.
How can companies stop the slopification of work?
Business leaders need to ensure information is meticulously verified and cleared of AI hallucinations or errors, and that AI is only used when it adds value. The Harvard Business Review suggests proprietary models or proprietary data may add value where public LLMs often do not.

About the author
Matthew Griffin Founder, 311 Institute
Matthew Griffin is a multi-award winning Futurist and expert in Disruption and Innovation, Geopolitics, Leadership, and Technology, who NASA have described as a "walking encyclopaedia of the future" and a "futurist Polymath."
Read full bio
Matthew Griffin is a multi-award winning Futurist and expert in Disruption and Innovation, Geopolitics, Leadership, and Technology, who NASA have described as a "walking encyclopaedia of the future" and a "futurist Polymath." 17-time best selling author of the "Codex of the Future" series, Matthew is the Founder and Futurist in Chief of the 311 Institute, a global Futures and Deep Futures advisory firm working with royal households, world leaders, G7, G20, and G77 governments, NGOs, and multi-national mid and mega cap firms to help them explore, shape, and lead the next 50 years of business and society.
An award-winning YouTube creator with over a million followers, with an unrivalled global reach and impact, Matthew is a highly sought-after international keynote speaker, lecturer, and mentor who collaborates with global leaders through the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC) and United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) to shape pivotal initiatives such as the UN’s AI for Humanity program, the United Nations Conference of the Parties (UN COP), and the World Economic Forum in Davos.
As the former Global Head of Cloud, National Security, and Enterprise Sales for companies including Atos, Dell-EMC, and IBM, Matthew has a proven track record of building multi-billion dollar business units and turning failing divisions into market leaders. His ability to identify, analyse, and communicate the implications of hundreds of emerging technologies and trends is unparalleled, and his insights are trusted by many of the world’s most respected organisations, including ABB, Accenture, Adidas, AON, ARM, BCG, Centrica, Citi, Coca-Cola, Dentons, Deloitte, Dow Jones, EY, Google, KPMG, Lego, Legal & General, LinkedIn, Microsoft, PepsiCo, Qualcomm, RWE, Samsung, Siemens AG and Siemens Energy, T-Mobile, UBS, VISA, Walmart, Workday, Worldpay and many others.
Regularly featured in the global media including the AP, BBC, Bloomberg, CNBC, Discovery, Forbes, Khaleej Times, Telegraph, TIME, ViacomCBS, WIRED, and the WSJ, Matthews mission is to help organisations create a fair and sustainable future whose benefits are shared by everyone irrespective of their ability, background, or circumstances.
What future do you need to see?
Choose one to get started on AI and intelligence and the future of your organisation.
Source: first published by Fanatical Futurist on 20 Jun 2026. You are welcome to quote this article with credit and a link to the original.