Matthew Griffin, described as “The Adviser behind the Advisers” and a “Young Kurzweil,” is the founder and CEO of the 311 Institute, a global futures think tank working between the dates of 2020 to 2070, and is an award winning futurist, and author of “Codex of the Future.” Regularly featured in the global media, including AP, BBC, CNBC, Discovery, RT, and Viacom, Matthew’s ability to identify, track, and explain the impacts of hundreds of revolutionary emerging technologies on global culture, industry and society, is unparalleled. Recognised for the past six years as one of the world’s foremost futurists, innovation and strategy experts Matthew is an international speaker who helps governments, investors, multi-nationals and regulators around the world envision, build and lead an inclusive, sustainable future. A rare talent Matthew’s recent work includes mentoring several Education and Lunar XPrize teams, building the first generation of biological computers and re-envisioning global education with the G20, and helping the world’s largest conglomerates ideate the next 20 years of intelligent devices and machines. Matthew's clients include three Prime Ministers and several governments, including the G7, Accenture, Bain & Co, BCG, BOA, Blackrock, Bentley, Credit Suisse, Dell EMC, Dentons, Deloitte, Du Pont, E&Y, HPE, Huawei, JPMorgan Chase, KPMG, McKinsey, PWC, Qualcomm, SAP, Samsung, Sopra Steria, UBS, and many more.
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF
A chemical computer, one that doesn’t use electrical signals to communicate, means that we now, potentially, have a way to send computer instructions around the human body that won’t interfere with our nervous system.
You probably take it for granted that the devices that enable our modern day life communicate with each other by using electricity. Either by wire or by electromagentic waves, it always comes back to an electrical signal flickering on and off and on again. But a new research project out of Stanford University is experimenting with using chemicals, as opposed to electricity, to send data from one machine to the next. They’ve even managed to send a text message.
Instead of sending ones and zeros by turning a current off and on, this system sends pulses of acid (Vinegar) and bass (Glass cleaner). The message, in binary chemical bits, travels through plastic tubes to the destination computer which tracks changes in pH levels to decipher the message.
“Every problem that we’ve addressed in traditional wireless communications over the last three or four decades is really different now because we’ve created a completely different mode of communicating,” said Andrea Goldsmith, Stanford professor of electrical engineering, “as so, it opens up all of these new ways of thinking about the optimal way to design this type of communication system.”
The possible applications for a stable, non-electronic messaging system are myriad. It could operate as a backup or alternate source of communication in case of a blackout and it’s already intrinsically hardened to withstand Electromagnetic Pulses – something which, against the backdrop of today’s growing nuclear proliferation is of increasing concern to the US Government – as well as places where sending electric signals are difficult, like underwater.
For the next step, Goldsmith and her fellow researchers are looking at human-based nanotechnology. Traditional communication is a problem for in-body nanotech because electronic signals don’t behave well inside the body and could cause potential organ damage. A messaging system not reliant on electricity could forego these problems altogether opening up a multitude of new opportunities for companies, and devices who, for whatever reason need to send computer messages around the human body. Whether it’s to enable communication with and between, for example, nanobots, neuroprosthetics or other implanted medical devices.
“It’s just so ‘out there,’ like science fiction,” Goldsmith says, “what are all the exciting ways that we could use this to enable communication that is impossible today? That’s what I would want someone to walk away thinking about.”