Scroll Top

BOE’s insane 16k display humbles the TV market

WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF

If you thought 8k resolution was as good as it gets displays have so much more to offer.

 

Love the Exponential Future? Join our XPotential Community, future proof yourself with courses from XPotential University, read about exponential tech and trendsconnect, watch a keynote, or browse my blog.

4K monitors are commonplace these days, and 8K monitors are readily available — albeit with exorbitant price tags like the Dell UltraSharp 32 8K Monitor which costs just over $4,000. But, of course, we can’t be happy with “just” an 8K resolution display, as witnessed by the latest creation from BOE. The Chinese display giant was on-hand at Display Week  and showcased a massive 110-inch display with a staggering 16K resolution.

 

RELATED
Scientists used bioreactors to grow human burgers, technically its not cannabalism

 

To put that resolution in perspective, 8K is 7680 x 4320, while 16K boosts that to 15360 × 8640. So we’re looking at 132.7 million pixels compared to 33.2 million pixels for 8K and 8.3 million pixels for 4K resolution. With that many pixels to push, you won’t be surprised to learn that BOE’s display only has a 60Hz refresh rate.

If you could find the space for a 110-inch display on your living room wall, BOE says that you’ll be subject to a maximum of 400 nits brightness and a 1,200:1 contrast ratio, which is about average for an IPS panel. In addition, the 16K display covers 99 percent of the DCI-P3 color gamut.

While reporters didn’t have hands-on experience with the BOE’s display, Vincent_Teoh, said that pixels were not visible even when peering close to the display. That would mesh with BOE’s claim that its 16K display offers “Extremely high resolution beyond the retina.”

 

RELATED
Sony's unveil their colossal new 16k display that could be yours for $5million

 

Now before you get any ideas about hooking this monitor up to your bodacious AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D processor backed by an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 GPU, you’d likely be unable to push any serious fps at a 16K resolution in games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Microsoft Flight Simulator. Considering that you’re shovelling 16 times more pixels at 16K than 4K resolution, those previously fluid frame rates would likely drop into slideshow territory.

And I must also point out that BOE’s 16K is just a prototype unit built to wow the crowds, we’re still years away from such a product being viable for large-scale production.

Related Posts

Leave a comment

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This