Quantum computers operate in fundamentally new ways that mean they can perform calculations that would take classical computers billions of years in just minutes.


Love the Exponential Future? Join our XPotential Community, future proof yourself with courses from XPotential Universityconnect, watch a keynote, or browse my blog.

Earlier in the year Google announced to the world that it had achieved a major computing milestone known as Quantum Supremacy – the point in time when a quantum computer proved itself to be more powerful than every other classical computer on Earth. And now researchers in China claim to have achieved quantum supremacy aswell, and as the race to create the world’s most powerful quantum computers heats up not only they help countries revolutionise their rates of innovation, of everything from AI’s and drugs, to materials and transportation, but they’ll also signal the end of secrets and encryption as we know it.


China launches worlds first unhackable Quantum communications satellite


In their case their quantum computer, named Jiuzhang, reportedly conducted a calculation in 200 seconds that would have taken a regular supercomputer, like the US Department of Energy’s Summit supercomputer which can perform a staggering 200 quadrillion calculations per second, an eye watering 2.5 billion years to complete.

Traditional computers process data as binary bits – either a zero or a one. Quantum computers, on the other hand, have a distinct advantage in that their bits can also be both a one and a zero at the same time. As described in Rose’s Law that raises the potential processing power exponentially, as two quantum bits, or Qubits, can be in four possible states, three qubits can be in eight states, and so on.


New storage breakthrough stores 215 petabytes on one gram of DNA


That means quantum computers can explore many possibilities simultaneously, while a classical computer would have to run through each option one after the other. Progress so far has seen quantum computers perform calculations much faster than traditional ones, but their ultimate test would be when they can do things that classical computers simply can’t. And that milestone has been dubbed “Quantum Supremacy.”

Last year, Google was the first to claim it had cracked quantum supremacy. The company said that its 53-qubit Sycamore processor had performed a certain computation within 200 seconds – a task that Google estimated would have taken the world’s most powerful supercomputer 10,000 years.


OpenAI develops curious AI's that learn for themselves


And now China claims to have joined the quantum supremacy club. The Jiuzhang computer reportedly found the solution to a particularly challenging problem within three minutes and 20 seconds. A traditional supercomputer, on the other hand, would take no less than 2.5 billion years to do the same – for reference, that’s more than half the current age of the Earth.

The calculation was what’s known as Boson Sampling, which computes the output of a complex optical circuit. Basically, photons are sent into the system via many inputs, and once inside they’re split by beam splitters and bounced around by mirrors. Boson sampling takes all those variables into account and calculates the possible output of this maze – an incredibly difficult task for a regular computer, but a good test for quantum computers.


MIT tests the future of cybersecurity, pits AI's against AI's


In this case, Jiuzhang was working with 50 photons, 100 inputs, 100 outputs, 300 beam splitters and 75 mirrors. The computer managed to calculate a distribution sample in about as long as it takes to make a coffee, whereas Sunway TaihuLight – currently the fourth most powerful supercomputer in the world – would have needed a fifth of the entire age of the universe to do the same job.

That’s clearly a huge achievement, but it doesn’t mean that traditional computers are going anywhere any time soon. These kinds of calculations aren’t particularly useful work in themselves – they’re mostly tests to show off the potential power of quantum computers. Plus, they still have some stability issues that need addressing, and won’t necessarily be better at everything than their predecessors.

The research was published in the journal Science.

Source: Science via Phys.org

About author

Matthew Griffin

Matthew Griffin, described as “The Adviser behind the Advisers” and a “Young Kurzweil,” is the founder and CEO of the World Futures Forum and the 311 Institute, a global Futures and Deep Futures consultancy working between the dates of 2020 to 2070, and is an award winning futurist, and author of “Codex of the Future” series. Regularly featured in the global media, including AP, BBC, Bloomberg, CNBC, Discovery, RT, Viacom, and WIRED, Matthew’s ability to identify, track, and explain the impacts of hundreds of revolutionary emerging technologies on global culture, industry and society, is unparalleled. Recognised for the past six years as one of the world’s foremost futurists, innovation and strategy experts Matthew is an international speaker who helps governments, investors, multi-nationals and regulators around the world envision, build and lead an inclusive, sustainable future. A rare talent Matthew’s recent work includes mentoring Lunar XPrize teams, re-envisioning global education and training with the G20, and helping the world’s largest organisations envision and ideate the future of their products and services, industries, and countries. Matthew's clients include three Prime Ministers and several governments, including the G7, Accenture, Aon, Bain & Co, BCG, Credit Suisse, Dell EMC, Dentons, Deloitte, E&Y, GEMS, Huawei, JPMorgan Chase, KPMG, Lego, McKinsey, PWC, Qualcomm, SAP, Samsung, Sopra Steria, T-Mobile, and many more.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *