Regulation and Law
Researchers warn that AI capabilities are increasingly discovered rather than designed, and that the window to understand how these black-box systems reason is closing as their influence grows.
A Chinese court has ruled that adopting AI is not a lawful excuse to fire staff, ordering a tech firm to reinstate a worker it tried to replace with a large language model — an early sign of judicial pushback against AI-driven layoffs.
Objection, an AI platform backed by Peter Thiel, will score every journalist in the world on credibility — promising cheaper redress while alarming those who rely on anonymous sources.
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF The number of global risks are proliferating and the ability for civilians to manufacture increasingly…
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF Regulatory compliance can cost companies up to 10% of their revenues to actually do, so…
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF Increasingly companies are being held accountable for the things their AI’s say and do, and…
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF Previously trying to get AI to forget anything was impossible because it retained “memories” of…
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF The first fake regulatory filing for a crypto project shows just how brazen criminals are…
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF Many artists and content creators are trying to sue AI companies who trained their Generative…
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF By imposing a tax on the amount of carbon used to manufacture products that the…
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF What if employees helped create AI regulations? Would it be like Turkeys trying to regulate…
WHY THIS MATTERS IN BRIEF Some people think AI knows all, it doesn’t, and some professions should be very careful…